An In-Depth Analysis of Recent Developments in Tesla Stock (TSLA)

Executive Summary

Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) has experienced significant volatility in its stock performance, marked by recent declines and sharp fluctuations. The company’s financial results for Q4 2024 and Q1 2025 reveal a challenging period for its automotive segment, with notable decreases in revenue, vehicle deliveries, and operating income. This downturn in the core vehicle business is juxtaposed against the robust and rapidly expanding energy generation and storage division, which continues to demonstrate impressive growth and profitability.

Strategically, Tesla is pivoting to address these challenges by accelerating the development of more affordable vehicle models and pushing forward with ambitious projects in autonomous driving (Full Self-Driving and Robotaxi) and humanoid robotics (Optimus). The energy business is also slated for substantial expansion, positioning it as an increasingly vital component of Tesla’s long-term growth narrative.

However, the company navigates a complex competitive landscape, particularly with the aggressive rise of Chinese EV manufacturers like BYD, which are eroding Tesla’s market share in key international regions. Furthermore, Tesla faces considerable external pressures, including evolving regulatory environments, potential changes to EV tax credits in the US, and geopolitical trade tensions. The highly public and often controversial actions of CEO Elon Musk continue to exert a material influence on investor sentiment and brand perception, introducing a unique layer of key-person risk. The overall investment profile for Tesla reflects a company in transition, balancing established automotive challenges with speculative, high-potential ventures across multiple technological frontiers.

I. Tesla Stock Performance and Market Sentiment

Tesla’s stock (TSLA) has recently demonstrated considerable volatility, reflecting a complex interplay of market dynamics, corporate performance, and external factors. As of June 6, 2025, Tesla’s share price stood at $284.76.¹ The stock opened at $298.84 on June 6, 2025, representing a 4.97% gain from the previous day’s close of $284.69.² However, the preceding days saw a significant decline, with TSLA stock moving down by 17.8% in the seven days leading up to June 5, 2025.¹ A particularly sharp one-day loss of 14.26% occurred on June 5, 2025, resulting in an approximate $235 billion reduction in the company’s market capitalization.³ This dramatic drop brought the stock back to levels observed roughly a month prior.³

Over a broader timeframe, Tesla’s stock has experienced substantial fluctuations. Its 52-week high reached $488.54, while its 52-week low was $167.41.¹ As of June 6, 2025, the stock is positioned 174.74% above its 52-week low and 59.89% below its 52-week high.² Year-to-date, the stock has declined by 24.9% in 2025.⁵ The sharp 14.26% drop on June 5, 2025, and the subsequent 5% gain on June 6, 2025, directly correlate with the public dispute between Elon Musk and Donald Trump.³ This immediate and severe market reaction to a non-operational, political dispute involving the CEO demonstrates that a substantial portion of Tesla’s valuation is tied to Elon Musk’s public image and perceived political alignment. This creates an elevated level of key-person risk for TSLA shareholders, where external, non-business-related events can trigger significant value destruction or creation.

Analyst Consensus Ratings and Price Targets

Analyst consensus ratings for Tesla stock present a mixed picture. Some sources indicate a “Buy” consensus ², while others suggest a “Hold”.⁸ Based on 93 analysts, the average rating score is derived from 60 buy, 16 hold, and 17 sell ratings.² Another assessment, based on 64 analysts, shows a “Hold” consensus, with 23% recommending Strong Buy, 28% Buy, 27% Hold, 8% Sell, and 14% Strong Sell.⁸

The median target price provided by analysts is $297.66, with a high estimate of $550.00 and a low of $115.00.² Goldman Sachs recently adjusted its price target downwards to $285 from $295, maintaining a “Neutral” rating.⁹ In contrast, Morgan Stanley maintains a $410 price target with a “Buy” rating ¹⁰, and TD Cowen reaffirmed a “Buy” rating with a $330 target.¹¹ Public.com, however, presents a current stock price of $334.08 and a target of $245.65, implying a potential 26.47% decrease.⁸ This wide range in analyst price targets and the conflicting consensus ratings signal significant uncertainty and a lack of clear conviction among financial professionals regarding Tesla’s future trajectory. This divergence likely stems from the complex interplay of promising long-term ventures (Full Self-Driving, Optimus, Energy) against immediate challenges (automotive demand, competition, regulatory headwinds, and CEO controversies). The broad spectrum of analyst opinions reflects the highly speculative nature of Tesla’s valuation, as analysts weigh the tangible, but struggling, automotive business against the immense, but nascent and unproven, potential of its AI, robotics, and energy ventures. The uncertainty is further compounded by the unpredictability of Elon Musk’s influence and the evolving regulatory landscape.

Institutional and Insider Ownership Trends

Institutional investment in Tesla remains substantial, with 5026 institutional owners holding a total of 1,766,329,353 shares.¹² Major institutional holders include Vanguard Group Inc. (7.67%), BlackRock Inc. (6.39%), State Street Corp. (3.53%), Geode Capital Management, LLC (1.97%), Morgan Stanley – Brokerage Accounts (1.41%), and Capital World Investors (1.25%).¹ However, recent trends indicate a shift, with the total number of institutional owners changing by -3.55% quarter-over-quarter, and the average portfolio allocation decreasing by -18.41% quarter-over-quarter.¹²

Concurrently, there have been notable insider sales. CFO Vaibhav Taneja sold 1,000 shares on June 3, 2025, and an additional 6,000 shares on June 2, 2025.⁴ Directors Ira Matthew Ehrenpreis and Kimbal Musk also sold substantial amounts, 477,572 and 91,588 shares respectively, on May 27, 2025.⁴ In Q1 2025, board members and an executive collectively offloaded over $118 million in shares, realizing approximately $100 million in profits, which coincided with a nearly 50% stock plunge.¹³ While some of these sales were conducted under pre-planned Rule 10b5-1 trading plans, others were not.¹³ The decline in the number of institutional owners and a significant drop in average portfolio allocation suggest a trend of institutional de-risking or reallocation away from Tesla. This, coupled with recent insider sales, particularly those not under pre-planned arrangements and coinciding with stock declines, could signal a lack of confidence from those closest to the company. While routine insider sales occur, the combination of institutional reduction and non-routine insider selling during periods of stock weakness suggests that large, sophisticated investors and those with direct company knowledge are becoming more cautious about Tesla’s immediate future. This could indicate concerns about the company’s ability to navigate current headwinds or the sustainability of its growth narrative, potentially leading to further downward pressure on the stock.

Discussion on Market Valuation and Key Ratios

Tesla’s market capitalization is reported with some variation across sources, ranging from $752.32 billion ² to $1.1 trillion ¹ and $1.17 trillion.¹⁴ Despite these discrepancies, all figures indicate a very large valuation. The company’s P/E Ratio stands at 196.48.¹ Additionally, Tesla shares trade at 120 times expected earnings, a multiple described as “lofty” when compared to other automakers and even major tech companies like Nvidia.⁷

However, when considering its energy segment, Tesla trades at 13x forward EV/EBITDA, which is a discount compared to peers such as NextEra Energy (NEE) at 22x.¹⁶ This particular valuation metric, however, may not fully capture the superior margins and growth trajectory of Tesla’s energy business.¹⁶ Tesla’s high P/E ratio and forward earnings multiple traditionally suggest a growth stock with high future expectations. However, the energy segment’s lower EV/EBITDA, significantly lower than a utility peer, implies that the market might still be primarily valuing Tesla as an automotive company, underappreciating its rapidly growing and higher-margin energy business. The market’s current valuation framework for Tesla appears to be lagging behind the company’s evolving business mix. If the energy segment continues its rapid growth and profitability, and the automotive segment faces sustained headwinds, investors may need to fundamentally shift their valuation paradigm from a “tech/automotive growth stock” to a “diversified sustainable energy and AI conglomerate.” This implies a potential re-rating opportunity for the energy segment, but also a risk if the automotive challenges persist and drag down overall sentiment.

Table 1: Tesla Stock Performance & Analyst Consensus (June 2025)

Metric	Value	Source
Current Price (as of 6 Jun 2025)	$284.76	1
Today’s Low	$274.74	1
Today’s High	$323.66	1
52-Week High	$488.54	1
52-Week Low	$167.41	1
6-Month Performance	-26.85%	1
1-Year Performance	60.0%	1
Market Cap	$752.32B – $1.17T	2
P/E Ratio	196.48	1
Analyst Consensus Rating	Hold (27% Hold, 28% Buy, 23% Strong Buy, 8% Sell, 14% Strong Sell)	8
Median Price Target	$297.66	2
High Estimate	$550.00	2
Low Estimate	$115.00	2

II. Financial Performance Analysis: Q4 2024 & Q1 2025

Tesla’s recent financial results for the fourth quarter of 2024 and the first quarter of 2025 highlight a period of mixed performance, characterized by challenges in its core automotive business contrasted with robust growth in its energy segment.

Detailed Review of Revenue, Profitability, and Earnings Per Share (EPS)

In Q1 2025, released on April 22, 2025, Tesla reported total revenue of $19.3 billion, marking a 9% year-over-year (YoY) decrease.¹⁴ This figure fell short of Wall Street’s consensus expectation of $21.345 billion.¹⁷ Automotive revenues specifically declined by 20% from Q1 2024, reaching $14.0 billion.¹⁴ In stark contrast, the energy generation and storage revenue surged by 67% to $2.73 billion ¹⁴, while services and other revenue saw a 15% increase to $2.6 billion.¹⁴ GAAP operating income plummeted by 66% YoY to $399 million, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%, down from 5.5% in Q1 2024.¹⁴ GAAP net income declined by 71% to $409 million ¹⁴, with diluted EPS at $0.12 and non-GAAP EPS at $0.27, missing the expected $0.41.¹⁷ Profitability was adversely affected by a reduced average selling price (ASP) for vehicles due to product mix and sales incentives, a decline in vehicle deliveries (partly attributed to Model Y updates), a negative foreign exchange impact of $0.3 billion, and increased operating expenses driven by AI and R&D projects.¹⁴ Notably, regulatory credit sales amounted to $595 million, without which Tesla would have reported a loss in Q1 2025.¹⁷

For Q4 2024, released on January 29, 2025, total revenue increased by 2% YoY to $25.7 billion ¹⁵, but this also missed the Wall Street consensus of $27.224 billion.²⁰ Operating income decreased by 23% YoY to $1.6 billion, yielding a 6.2% operating margin.¹⁵ Non-GAAP EPS was $0.73, below the $0.77 expectation.²⁰ Gross profits were down 6% YoY.²⁰ Profitability in this quarter was influenced by reduced S3XY vehicle ASP, increased operating expenses (AI and R&D), partially offset by growth in gross profit from Energy Generation and Storage and Services, lower cost per vehicle, and higher regulatory credit revenue.¹⁵

Looking at the Full Year 2024, Tesla’s total revenue reached $97.69 billion, a slight increase from $96.77 billion in 2023.²¹ Net income attributable to common stockholders was $7.09 billion, a decrease from $14.99 billion in 2023, primarily due to a one-time tax benefit in the prior year.²¹ Automotive revenue saw a 6% decline to $77.07 billion, driven by lower ASP, though partially mitigated by $2.76 billion in regulatory credit revenue.²¹ The energy generation and storage revenue surged by 67% to $10.09 billion.¹⁹ The consistent misses on revenue and EPS in both Q4 2024 and Q1 2025, coupled with significant declines in automotive revenue and operating income, clearly indicate a severe slowdown in Tesla’s core vehicle business.¹⁴ This is partially masked by increasing reliance on regulatory credit sales.¹⁵ In stark contrast, the energy generation and storage segment is a standout performer, consistently showing robust triple-digit growth in deployments and strong revenue increases.¹⁴ This suggests a critical strategic shift where the energy division is becoming an increasingly vital, and more profitable, growth engine, potentially offsetting the automotive segment’s struggles. Tesla is undergoing a significant internal rebalancing, with the automotive business facing maturity pains, intense competition, and demand challenges, forcing price reductions and reliance on regulatory credits to maintain profitability. Concurrently, the energy business is rapidly emerging as a high-margin, high-growth sector, driven by structural demand for grid stabilization and AI infrastructure. This implies that Tesla’s future growth narrative is increasingly shifting from purely EV dominance to a broader “sustainable energy and AI infrastructure” play.

Analysis of Vehicle Production and Delivery Trends

Vehicle deliveries in Q1 2025 dropped by 13% to 336,681 units, with total vehicle production decreasing by 16%.¹⁴ Tesla attributed this decline primarily to planned Model Y production line changeovers across all its factories.¹⁴ Looking ahead, Goldman Sachs projects Q2 2025 deliveries to be 365,000 units, a reduction from their previous estimate of 410,000 and below the consensus of 417,000.⁹ Their forecast suggests Q2 deliveries could range between 335,000 and 395,000 units.⁹ Goldman Sachs also revised its delivery assumptions downwards for 2025, 2026, and 2027 to 1.575 million, 1.865 million, and 2.15 million units, respectively.⁹

Regional data further underscores these challenges. Tesla’s sales in several key European markets continue to decline sharply in Q2 2025, down approximately 50% from Q2 2024 and even trailing Q1 2025 figures, despite the new Model Y now being available.²³ Specifically, April deliveries in France were down 59% YoY, in Denmark down 67% YoY, and in Portugal down 47% YoY.²³ In China, shipments from Tesla’s Shanghai factory dropped 15% in May 2025 compared to the previous year, marking the eighth consecutive month of decline.²⁴ The Shanghai factory’s utilization rate was 76% in May 2025, a 10 percentage point decrease from May 2024.²⁴ Tesla’s market share in China’s battery EV market has plummeted from over 20% in 2021 to just 10% in 2025.²⁴ In response to these trends, Tesla has initiated aggressive promotions in Q2 2025, including free Full Self-Driving (FSD) transfer and 0% APR financing for new Model 3 orders in North America, and a five-year, zero-interest financing program for the new Model Y in China.²⁵ While Tesla initially attributed Q1 delivery declines to Model Y changeovers, the continued sharp sales declines in Europe and China in Q2 2025, even after production is back to normal and the new Model Y is available, strongly suggest a deeper underlying issue of weakening demand rather than just temporary production bottlenecks.¹⁴ The aggressive Q2 promotions further support this, indicating Tesla is actively trying to stimulate demand, potentially at the cost of future sales or margins. The narrative is shifting from a temporary production hiccup to a more systemic demand challenge for Tesla’s automotive division. This “demand collapse” ²³ is a significant indicator, especially in markets where battery electric vehicle (BEV) sales from competitors are surging.²³ It implies that Tesla’s pricing strategy, product refresh cycle, or competitive positioning is no longer sufficient to maintain market share and growth without significant incentives, which will inevitably impact margins.

In-depth Look at the Rapidly Growing Energy Generation and Storage Segment

Tesla’s energy generation and storage segment has emerged as a significant growth driver. In Q1 2025, revenue from this division grew by 67% YoY to $2.73 billion.¹⁴ Storage deployments saw an even more impressive increase of 154% YoY, reaching 10.4 GWh in Q1 2025.¹⁴ For the full year 2024, deployments hit 31.4 GWh, representing a 114% increase over 2023.¹⁶ The energy segment’s gross profit reached $2.6 billion in 2024, a substantial rise from $1.1 billion in 2023 and less than $300 million in 2022.¹⁹ This segment boasts a gross margin of 26.2%, significantly higher than the automotive segment’s 14.2%.¹⁶

The Megapack, Tesla’s grid-scale battery system, is the primary driver of this growth.¹⁶ It is utilized for diverse applications, including powering AI supercomputers (e.g., xAI’s Colossus 2 uses 168 Megapacks for 200,000 GPUs) and stabilizing island grids.¹⁶ To meet surging demand, Tesla’s Shanghai Megafactory and Lathrop facility are operational and ramping up production.¹⁶ By 2026, Tesla aims to scale Megapack output to support large-scale projects like the Cortex supercluster in Texas.¹⁶ In the residential sector, demand for the Powerwall, Tesla’s home battery, continues to outpace supply, indicating persistent production bottlenecks.¹⁶ The Powerwall 3 is notably disrupting the solar inverter market, becoming the most quoted battery brand (63% market share) and the second-most quoted inverter brand in H2 2024.²⁶ A significant factor contributing to this growth is the increasing demand driven by artificial intelligence (AI). Tesla’s energy storage solutions are considered a “critical enabler of the AI infrastructure boom,” providing the stable power necessary for training large language models (LLMs) and supporting data centers.¹⁶ This is viewed as a potential “$100+ billion opportunity”.¹⁶ The energy storage business is not just a supplementary division but is rapidly becoming one of Tesla’s most important growth levers.¹⁹ Its triple-digit growth, superior margins, and critical role in enabling the AI infrastructure boom position it as a strategic counterbalance to the automotive segment’s struggles. This implies that Tesla is evolving into a diversified energy and AI infrastructure company, which could fundamentally alter its long-term investment thesis and valuation. The consistent growth and profitability provide a crucial counter-narrative to the automotive segment’s recent struggles, offering a more predictable and high-margin revenue stream. This strategic focus on energy infrastructure not only diversifies Tesla’s business model but also aligns with global megatrends in renewable energy and AI, potentially making Tesla a more resilient and attractive long-term investment.

Cash Flow and Balance Sheet Strength

Despite the challenges in the automotive segment, Tesla has maintained a robust financial position. Its cash position remained strong at $37.0 billion in Q1 2025, representing a sequential increase of $0.4 billion.¹⁴ Free cash flow for Q1 2025 rose by 126% to $664 million.¹⁴ In Q4 2024, quarter-end cash, cash equivalents, and investments totaled $36.6 billion, a sequential increase of $2.9 billion, primarily driven by positive free cash flow of $2.0 billion.¹⁵ For the full year 2024, cash and investments reached $36.56 billion, up $7.47 billion from 2023, with operating cash flow improving to $14.92 billion from $13.26 billion in 2023.²¹ Tesla anticipates capital expenditures to exceed $11 billion annually through 2027 as it continues to expand production capacity and develop new products, including AI initiatives.²¹ Despite declining automotive revenue and profitability, Tesla has maintained a remarkably strong cash position and demonstrated positive, growing free cash flow.¹⁴ This financial strength provides the necessary capital to fund ambitious R&D projects and invest in future growth areas, such as energy storage expansion and new affordable vehicle platforms, without excessive reliance on external financing. Tesla’s healthy balance sheet and strong cash generation, particularly from its non-automotive segments, provide a crucial buffer against the current automotive downturn. This financial resilience allows Tesla to continue its aggressive innovation and expansion plans without resorting to dilutive equity raises or excessive debt, which is a significant competitive advantage in a capital-intensive industry.

Table 2: Tesla Key Financial Highlights (Q4 2024 & Q1 2025)

Metric	Q4 2024	Q1 2025	YoY % Change (Q1 2025)	Source
Total Revenue	$25.7B	$19.3B	-9%	14
Automotive Revenue	$19.798B	$13.967B	-20%	18
Energy Generation & Storage Revenue	$3.061B	$2.730B	67%	14
Services & Other Revenue	N/A	$2.6B	15%	14
GAAP Operating Income	$1.6B	$0.399B	-66%	14
Operating Margin	6.2%	2.1%	-3.4% pts	14
GAAP Net Income	N/A	$0.409B	-71%	14
Diluted EPS	N/A	$0.12	N/A	14
Non-GAAP EPS	$0.73	$0.27	N/A	17
Free Cash Flow	$2.0B	$0.664B	126%	14
Cash & Investments (Quarter-end)	$36.6B	$37.0B	N/A	14

III. Strategic Initiatives and Future Growth Drivers

Tesla’s strategic vision extends significantly beyond its current vehicle offerings, encompassing ambitious plans for new models, advanced autonomous driving, robotics, and a substantial expansion of its energy business. These initiatives are designed to fuel future growth and diversify the company’s revenue streams.

Overview of the Automotive Product Roadmap

A key component of Tesla’s automotive strategy is the introduction of new, more affordable models. The company confirmed plans for these vehicles to begin production in the first half of 2025.¹⁴ These models are expected to leverage elements of both current and next-generation platforms, allowing for production on existing manufacturing lines.¹⁴ With an anticipated price point of less than $30,000 ²⁸, these vehicles aim to compete directly with cheaper electric cars from other manufacturers and tap into a broader market segment.¹⁰ The first affordable model is projected to be a simplified Model Y, while the second is expected to be a smaller, feature-reduced version of the Model 3.²⁷ These affordable vehicles are described as resembling “the cars we currently make” in form and shape, possibly omitting features like a glass roof, premium audio system, rear touchscreen, ventilated/power-folding seats, and advanced Autopilot.²⁷ Tesla’s accelerated push for “affordable models” is a direct strategic response to intensifying competition, particularly from Chinese manufacturers like BYD offering lower-priced EVs, and weakening demand for its existing premium lineup.⁹ This move, utilizing existing production lines, aims to regain market share and volume growth, but also carries the risk of margin dilution if not executed efficiently. This strategic pivot towards affordability is a critical defensive and offensive maneuver. Defensively, it addresses the erosion of market share due to price-sensitive consumers and aggressive pricing by competitors. Offensively, it aims to unlock a much larger market segment that Tesla has historically not fully addressed. The challenge lies in achieving this affordability without cannibalizing existing higher-margin sales or significantly eroding overall automotive gross margins, especially as the company is already dealing with reduced average selling prices.¹⁴

In addition to new affordable models, Tesla plans refreshes for its existing lineup in 2025. These include refreshed Model Y Performance and 7-Seat Variants.²⁷ The Tesla Model S Refresh is expected to feature exterior updates, such as new front and rear fascias, and interior changes, including a larger center touchscreen that may replace the traditional driver’s gauge cluster, along with a transition to a 48V low-voltage system.²⁷ Similarly, the Tesla Model X Refresh is anticipated to incorporate design cues from the refreshed Model Y, adding front and rear light bars, a 48V low-voltage system, a front-facing bumper camera, new lighting, a larger center screen, ambient lighting, and improved trim quality.²⁷ Looking further ahead, the Tesla Roadster is slated for release in 2025/2026, with expectations of over 1,020 hp and 1,050 lb.-ft. of torque, a top speed exceeding 250 mph, and a dedicated all-wheel-drive platform.²⁷

Progress and Challenges in Full Self-Driving (FSD) and Robotaxi Development

Tesla continues to advance its autonomous driving capabilities. Full Self-Driving (Supervised) was introduced in China during Q1 2025.¹⁴ The company aims to elevate full self-driving technology to a new level, with the first test run for an autonomous robotaxi service scheduled to commence in Austin, Texas, in June 2025.²⁸ Plans include expanding this service to other U.S. cities, including locations in California, by the end of the year.²⁸ The Robotaxi itself is envisioned as a two-door coupe designed exclusively for driverless operation, drawing aesthetic inspiration from the Cybertruck. Its minimalist interior will notably lack a steering wheel or pedals, accommodating only two passengers.²⁷

Despite these ambitious plans, significant challenges and regulatory hurdles persist. U.S. regulators, specifically the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), are actively investigating Tesla’s robotaxi launch due to ongoing concerns regarding its FSD technology.³¹ These concerns include the system’s performance in reduced visibility conditions such as sun glare, fog, rain, or snow, its ability to handle emergency scenarios, and questions surrounding remote supervision, fleet size, rollout timeline, and the types of sensors and cameras used for safe operation.³¹ NHTSA initiated an investigation into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with FSD after four reported crashes, two of which resulted in fatalities. One incident involved a pedestrian struck and killed by a 2021 Model Y operating in FSD mode, and another fatal crash occurred in April 2024 when a Model S in FSD mode struck and killed a motorcyclist.³¹ Although Tesla recalled over 2 million vehicles in December 2023 to install new safeguards in its Autopilot system, NHTSA is still reviewing whether these measures adequately address concerns over driver attention and system safety.³¹ Critics also suggest that FSD and Autopilot systems may automatically disengage just before a crash, a tactic that could potentially prevent Tesla from being held directly liable as its software “wasn’t in control”.³² While Tesla is aggressively pushing FSD and Robotaxi deployment, significant regulatory scrutiny and safety concerns pose a substantial hurdle to commercialization.³¹ The ongoing investigations, fatal accidents, and questions about system disengagement highlight a critical gap between Tesla’s ambitious timelines and the need for proven safety and regulatory clearance. This could delay revenue generation from these initiatives and impact public trust, crucial for widespread adoption. The aggressive Robotaxi timeline appears to be on a collision course with regulatory caution and public safety concerns. The success of Robotaxi is not just a technological challenge but a complex regulatory and public trust battle.

Updates on the Optimus Humanoid Robot Commercialization

Tesla’s Optimus humanoid robot, a general-purpose robotic humanoid under development since 2021, is rapidly progressing towards commercialization.³³ Elon Musk has expressed a belief that Optimus “has the potential to be more significant than Tesla’s vehicle business over time”.³³ Tesla aims for aggressive production targets, planning to produce “several thousand units” in 2025, with a vision to scale up to approximately 500,000 units annually by 2027.³⁴

The initial deployment of Optimus robots is planned within Tesla’s own gigafactories in 2025, where they will perform repetitive or ergonomically challenging tasks.³⁴ Broader commercial availability for external markets is anticipated by 2026, with limited availability potentially as early as 2025.³⁴ The expected price point for Optimus is between $20,000 and $30,000 ³⁴, with Musk suggesting it could eventually drop to as low as $10,000.³⁴ This pricing strategy aims to significantly undercut competitors in the humanoid robotics space.³⁴ Further demonstrating the project’s ambitious scope, Musk has even floated the idea of sending an Optimus unit aboard a SpaceX Starship mission to Mars by 2026.³⁴ A recent photoshoot featuring Optimus with influencer Anna Malygon for Coeval Magazine underscores Tesla’s efforts to blend this advanced technology with human experiences and marketing.³⁶ Optimus represents a massive, speculative bet on a new product category with potentially transformative implications, as envisioned by Elon Musk.³³ Its aggressive production targets and ambitious pricing strategy indicate Tesla’s intent to dominate this nascent market. However, the commercial success and mass adoption of humanoid robots remain highly uncertain, making this a significant long-term growth driver with substantial risk. This initiative introduces a new layer of speculative risk to Tesla’s portfolio, where significant capital is being deployed into a venture with a highly uncertain, albeit potentially enormous, payoff.

Expansion Plans for the Energy Business (Megapack, Powerwall)

Tesla is making substantial investments in its energy sector, with expectations for capacities to increase by 50% in 2025.²⁸ The demand for both Powerwall and Megapack storage systems remains high.²⁸ A key role for this division involves the development of grid storage systems to stabilize power supplies.²⁸ To support this growth, a third gigafactory specifically for energy storage systems is currently planned.²⁸

Both the Shanghai Megafactory and the Lathrop facility are operational and actively ramping up production to meet the increasing demand.¹⁶ By 2026, Tesla aims to scale Megapack output to support large-scale projects, such as the Cortex supercluster in Texas.¹⁶ The aggressive expansion plans for the energy business, including new gigafactories and a 50% capacity increase in 2025, confirm its strategic importance.²⁸ This segment’s high demand and profitability position it as a stable, growing revenue source that can cushion the impact of automotive market fluctuations, reinforcing Tesla’s long-term vision as a sustainable energy company. The energy business is evolving into a foundational “anchor” for Tesla’s financial performance. Its consistent growth and profitability provide a crucial counter-narrative to the automotive segment’s recent struggles, offering a more predictable and high-margin revenue stream. This strategic focus on energy infrastructure not only diversifies Tesla’s business model but also aligns with global megatrends in renewable energy and AI, potentially making Tesla a more resilient and attractive long-term investment, even if its automotive growth moderates.

IV. Competitive Landscape and Market Dynamics

The global electric vehicle (EV) market is undergoing rapid evolution, characterized by increasing adoption rates, intensifying competition, and shifting regional dynamics. These trends significantly influence Tesla’s market position and strategic decisions.

Global EV Market Trends and Adoption Rates

Electric vehicle sales experienced a record-breaking year in 2024 and are projected to sustain their growth trajectory in 2025.³⁷ Globally, EVs are anticipated to grow at a mid-teens percentage rate in 2025.³⁷ This growth is largely propelled by continuous technological advancements, particularly in battery technology, which translates into longer ranges and faster charging times, alongside the expansion of charging infrastructure and supportive government incentives.³⁷ In 2025, electrified vehicles could account for up to 25% of new vehicle purchases worldwide, an increase from the predicted 20% in 2024.³⁸ The overall EV market is growing, but it is also maturing, with more players and intensified competition.³⁷ This shift from a nascent market dominated by a few players to a more crowded, competitive landscape means Tesla can no longer rely solely on early-mover advantage or brand prestige. The EV market is transitioning from a “land grab” phase to a more mature, competitive environment. This implies that Tesla’s historical market dominance is being challenged by a proliferation of models, diverse pricing strategies, and rapid technological advancements from competitors. Tesla’s ability to maintain its leadership will increasingly depend on its capacity for rapid innovation, cost efficiency, and effective market-specific strategies, rather than just being “the EV company.”

Analysis of Key Competitors and their Impact on Tesla’s Market Share

China is expected to remain the largest and most innovative EV market globally, with predictions that EV sales will surpass internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles in 2025, accounting for 65% of global EV sales.³⁷

BYD is a leading force in China, having delivered 4.27 million EVs and plug-in hybrids in 2024.³⁸ BYD’s strategy emphasizes robust hardware integration, including its proprietary DiPilot driver assistance system, custom-designed chips for optimized vehicle performance, and highly regarded batteries and thermal management systems.²⁹ Critically, BYD’s models often undercut Tesla’s pricing by 30-50%.³⁰ The company also achieved a significant milestone by outselling Tesla in Europe for the first time in April 2025, registering 7,231 battery electric vehicles (BEVs) compared to Tesla’s 7,165 units.²⁹ The emergence of BYD as a global EV powerhouse, surpassing Tesla in sales in Q4 2024 and Q1 2025 ³⁰, and even outselling Tesla in Europe in April 2025 ²⁹, represents a fundamental shift in the competitive landscape. BYD’s strategy of offering diverse, affordable models with strong hardware and rapid charging is directly challenging Tesla’s premium positioning and software-first approach, particularly in the critical Chinese market. The “Tesla vs BYD” rivalry is not just about sales figures; it is a clash of philosophies.³⁰ BYD’s mastery of battery technology, vertical integration, and focus on affordability positions it strongly in a price-sensitive market. Tesla, often described as the “Apple of the EV market,” faces the challenge of maintaining premium appeal while needing to compete on price. This implies that Tesla’s global market share will likely face sustained pressure, especially in emerging markets and price-sensitive segments, forcing it to either rapidly innovate in cost reduction or accept a smaller, more premium market niche.

Other Chinese Competitors like Xiaomi are also leveraging advanced technology to compete effectively on both price and performance.²⁴ Meanwhile, several Traditional Automakers, including Range Rover, Audi, BMW, Hyundai, Jaguar, Mercedes-Benz, and Ferrari, are set to release new EV models in 2025.³⁷ Toyota and Hyundai are expected to perform well due to their established reputation and cost structure.³⁷ Some broker research suggests that the peak of competitive intensity in the EV space may have passed, with expectations of more market exits and capacity cuts, and fewer model launches scheduled for 2025. This implies a potential consolidation of the market around top-tier players.³⁷

Tesla’s Market Share Performance in Critical Regions

Tesla’s market share performance exhibits a notable regional divergence. In China, shipments from its Shanghai factory decreased by 15% in May 2025 year-over-year.²⁴ Tesla’s share of China’s battery EV market has plummeted from over 20% in 2021 to just 10% in 2025. When including plug-in hybrids, this share further drops to 5.8%.²⁴ In Europe, Tesla’s sales continue to decline sharply in Q2 2025, approximately 50% lower than Q2 2024 figures and even trailing Q1 2025 performance.²³ This decline in Q1 2025 (37% compared to Q1 2024) coincided with a 24% surge in overall battery electric car sales, indicating a “demand collapse” for Tesla amidst a growing market and surging BEV sales from competitors.²³

Conversely, in the United States, Tesla maintains its leadership position, with sales exceeding 128,000 units in Q1 2025.²⁹ In April 2025, Tesla’s new EV market share increased by 3.7 percentage points, though it remained below 50%, primarily driven by the success of the Model Y, which held a 25.1% market share.⁴⁰ Tesla also dominated the used EV market in April 2025, capturing a 47.0% share, up 4.7 percentage points month-over-month.⁴⁰ In March 2025, Tesla’s new EV market share saw a 5 percentage point decline to 42%, although the Model Y and Model 3 remained top-selling vehicles.³⁹ The company continued to dominate the used EV market in March 2025 with a 54.5% share.³⁹ Tesla’s market share performance shows a stark regional divergence: strong leadership in the US but significant declines and market share erosion in China and Europe.²³ This suggests that Tesla’s global growth strategy is encountering saturation or stronger competitive responses in ex-US markets, necessitating localized product and pricing strategies. Tesla’s “one-size-fits-all” global strategy, or at least its execution, is proving less effective in highly competitive and rapidly evolving markets like China and Europe. These regions are characterized by diverse consumer preferences, aggressive local players, and different regulatory incentives. This implies that Tesla needs to adapt its product portfolio, pricing, and marketing more acutely to regional dynamics.

Pricing Strategies and the Affordable EV Segment

Tesla’s average selling price (ASP) for vehicles has been declining, which is impacting its profitability.¹⁴ In response to this trend and competitive pressures, Tesla is launching new, more affordable models in the first half of 2025, with an expected price of less than $30,000.²⁸ This strategic move is particularly relevant given that competitors like BYD offer models ranging from $20,000 to $35,000, effectively undercutting Tesla’s pricing by 30-50%.²⁹ The affordable EV market has “truly landed” in 2025, driven by decreasing battery costs, government incentives, and manufacturing maturity.³⁸ The shift towards affordability in the EV market is forcing Tesla to reduce its ASP and introduce cheaper models.¹⁴ This competitive necessity, driven by rivals like BYD, places significant pressure on Tesla’s automotive gross margins, which are already declining.¹⁴ Tesla is at a critical juncture where it must balance market share growth with profitability. The “affordability imperative” means that while new, cheaper models could drive volume, they risk further compressing automotive margins, which are already under pressure. This highlights the strategic importance of the higher-margin energy business to compensate for potential automotive margin erosion.

Table 3: Tesla Vehicle Deliveries & Market Share Trends (2024-2025)

Metric	Data Point	Source
Q1 2025 Total Deliveries	336,681 units (-13% YoY)	14
Q1 2025 Production	Down 16%	14
Q2 2025 Goldman Sachs Delivery Estimate (range)	335,000 – 395,000 units (Base: 365,000)	9
2025 Goldman Sachs Delivery Estimate (revised)	1.575M units (down from 1.7M)	22
2026 Goldman Sachs Delivery Estimate (revised)	1.865M units (down from 1.95M)	22
2027 Goldman Sachs Delivery Estimate (revised)	2.15M units (down from 2.2M)	22
China Battery EV Market Share (2021 vs 2025)	>20% (2021) to 10% (2025)	24
Europe Q1 2025 Sales Decline	-37% YoY (vs. 24% BEV market surge)	23
US New EV Market Share (April 2025)	Increased by 3.7% pts (remains <50%)	40
US Used EV Market Share (April 2025)	47.0% (up 4.7% pts MoM)	40

V. Regulatory Environment and Key Risks

Tesla operates within a dynamic regulatory environment, facing various external pressures and inherent risks that could significantly impact its operations and financial performance.

Potential Impact of Proposed US EV Tax Credit Changes and New Fees

The proposed “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” which has passed the House, suggests significant changes to US EV incentives. It proposes phasing out the $7,500 new EV tax credit after 2026, but for most vehicles, this credit would become unavailable at the end of 2025. This is due to a reversion to a previous structure where only automakers selling fewer than 200,000 EVs would qualify.⁴¹ Additionally, the $4,000 used EV tax credit would be eliminated entirely at the end of 2025.⁴¹ The legislation also introduces a new $250 annual fee for EV drivers, imposed by the Federal Highway Administration, intended to compensate for the lack of gas taxes paid by EV owners.⁴¹ This fee is notably more than three times what a typical new gas-powered car owner pays in federal gas taxes annually.⁴²

The potential impact on Tesla is subject to differing views. While Elon Musk previously suggested that the removal of the tax credit would affect competitors more than Tesla ⁴⁴, the reality is that half of all US EV sales are leases, where the credit applies fully.⁴⁴ Tesla’s Model 3 and Model Y are identified as highly leased EVs.⁴⁴ J.D. Power has observed that EV consumers are price-sensitive, and the loss of this credit could reduce interest in EV purchases.⁴⁴ A Bank of America analyst suggested that Tesla might struggle without the credit unless it releases a more affordable EV model, which has not yet materialized.⁴⁴ Conversely, some experts, like automotive expert Lauren Fix, predict that Tesla sales would remain largely unaffected, asserting that “People buy Teslas because they like the product” and that Tesla primarily focuses on selling carbon credits to other automakers.⁴³ The proposed elimination of EV tax credits presents a significant demand-side risk for the entire US EV market, including Tesla.⁴¹ While Tesla’s brand loyalty might cushion the blow, the substantial reliance on leasing for Model 3 and Y, where the credit is fully utilized, suggests a more direct and negative impact on Tesla’s sales volume and pricing power than initially acknowledged by Musk.⁴⁴ This could accelerate the need for Tesla’s affordable models. The repeal of EV tax credits is a critical demand-side risk that could exacerbate Tesla’s existing sales challenges, particularly for its more accessible models. While Tesla’s brand strength might provide some resilience, the direct financial impact on leased vehicles could be substantial. This regulatory headwind reinforces the urgency for Tesla to launch its truly “affordable” models to offset the increased effective cost to consumers and maintain sales momentum in the US market.

Trade Policy and Tariff Headwinds, particularly for the Energy Business

Uncertainty surrounding trade policy continues to impact global supply chains and cost structures for Tesla and its peers.¹⁴ The current tariff landscape has a “relatively larger impact” on Tesla’s Energy business compared to its automotive segment.¹⁸ This is largely due to Tesla’s reliance on lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries sourced from China, which exposes it to U.S. import tariffs.¹⁶ Eligibility for Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) tax credits also depends on meeting domestic content thresholds, prompting Tesla to prioritize sourcing more materials within North America.¹⁶ A recent example of escalating trade tensions includes the April 2025 imposition of a 125% tariff by the US on China imports, which was reciprocated by China.³⁰ Despite the strong performance of Tesla’s energy business, its reliance on Chinese-made LFP batteries exposes it to significant geopolitical and trade policy risks, particularly US tariffs.¹⁶ This could undermine the segment’s profitability and growth trajectory if not mitigated through increased domestic sourcing and production. The geopolitical landscape poses a tangible threat to the very segment that is currently offsetting automotive weaknesses. Tesla’s strategic response of localizing supply chains is crucial for long-term resilience, but execution risk remains.

Regulatory Scrutiny on Autonomous Driving Technology

Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology faces intense and ongoing regulatory scrutiny. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is actively investigating FSD due to safety concerns and reported crashes, including fatalities.³¹ Specific concerns raised by NHTSA include FSD’s performance in adverse conditions and its ability to handle emergency scenarios.³¹ Tesla has encountered challenges with regulatory compliance, particularly concerning its FSD system.⁴⁵ The U.S. Transportation Department wields considerable influence over vehicle design standards.⁴⁶ Analysts have also pointed out that Tesla’s reliance on camera-based detection, as opposed to the industry-standard use of radar and lidar sensors, could become a critical regulatory sticking point.⁴⁶ The intense and ongoing regulatory scrutiny, coupled with fatal accident investigations, poses a significant barrier to Tesla’s ability to fully commercialize and monetize its FSD and Robotaxi ambitions.³¹ The reliance on vision-only systems could become a critical regulatory hurdle, potentially forcing costly technological pivots or delaying widespread deployment. The regulatory environment is a major “gating factor” for Tesla’s AI and autonomous driving ambitions. The company’s aggressive timelines for Robotaxi may be unrealistic given the unresolved safety concerns and ongoing investigations. This implies that the projected multi-trillion dollar valuation from AI/autonomous driving is highly speculative and contingent on not only technological breakthroughs but also navigating a complex and cautious regulatory landscape, which could significantly delay or constrain its revenue potential.

Influence of Leadership Controversies and Brand Perception

The public actions and statements of CEO Elon Musk continue to exert a substantial influence on Tesla’s stock performance and brand perception. His highly publicized feud with Donald Trump, for instance, directly led to a 14% stock plunge and a $150 billion loss in market value.³ Musk’s unconventional leadership style and frequent use of social media have often sparked controversies that have translated into crises for the company.⁴⁵ His political alignments have been cited as a contributing factor to sales dips in major markets such as Europe, China, and California.⁴⁶ Tesla’s crisis communication strategies must therefore actively address Musk’s personal influence and emphasize the company’s operational separation from his individual ventures.⁴⁵ Elon Musk’s increasingly controversial public persona and political alignments are directly impacting Tesla’s brand perception and sales in key markets, as well as causing significant stock volatility.³ This amplifies the “key-person risk” and necessitates a robust crisis communication strategy to mitigate damage to consumer trust and investor confidence. Elon Musk, while a visionary leader, has become a significant source of systemic risk for Tesla. His controversies are not just public relations challenges; they translate into direct financial losses, operational challenges, and reputational damage that could hinder the adoption of future products like Robotaxi. This implies that Tesla’s valuation carries an inherent “Musk premium” but also a “Musk discount” due to his unpredictable behavior, making the stock highly sensitive to non-business-related events.

VI. Conclusion and Investment Outlook

Tesla stands at a pivotal juncture, evolving beyond its identity as a pure-play electric vehicle growth stock into a diversified technology conglomerate. The company is actively pursuing significant ventures in energy, artificial intelligence, and robotics, signaling a strategic broadening of its core business.

Synthesis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT)

Strengths:

• Strong Energy Business: The energy generation and storage segment exhibits rapid growth, maintains high gross margins, and plays a critical role in supporting the burgeoning AI infrastructure.¹⁴
• Robust Financial Position: Tesla maintains substantial cash reserves and generates positive free cash flow, providing the necessary capital to fund continued investments in research, development, and expansion.¹⁴
• Innovation Leader: The company remains a pioneer in the EV industry and is at the forefront of developing advanced technologies in Full Self-Driving, Robotaxi services, and humanoid robotics.²⁷
• Established Brand & Charging Network: Tesla benefits from strong brand loyalty in key markets, particularly the US, and possesses an extensive Supercharger network that provides a significant competitive advantage.²⁹

Weaknesses:

• Declining Automotive Sales & Market Share: Tesla has experienced significant drops in vehicle deliveries and market share in crucial international markets like Europe and China, suggesting underlying demand issues beyond temporary production adjustments.²³
• Profitability Pressure: Reduced average selling prices for vehicles, coupled with increased operating expenses and a growing reliance on regulatory credits, are impacting automotive segment margins.¹⁴
• Key-Person Risk: The public and often controversial actions and statements of CEO Elon Musk directly influence Tesla’s stock price and brand perception, introducing an element of unpredictability.³
• Regulatory Hurdles: Ongoing investigations into Full Self-Driving technology and potential regulatory challenges related to its vision-only approach pose significant obstacles to the commercialization of autonomous driving.³¹

Opportunities:

• Affordable EV Segment: The planned launch of new, more affordable vehicle models presents an opportunity to tap into a larger market segment and potentially reverse the trend of declining sales volume.¹⁴
• AI & Robotics Monetization: The long-term potential of Full Self-Driving, Robotaxi services, and the Optimus humanoid robot offers substantial, albeit highly speculative, avenues for future revenue generation.²⁷
• Global Energy Transition: The sustained high demand for grid-scale and residential energy storage solutions aligns with global megatrends in renewable energy, providing a robust growth pathway for the energy business.¹⁶
• Supply Chain Localization: Efforts to source materials and components within North America can help mitigate risks associated with international tariffs and geopolitical tensions.¹⁶

Threats:

• Intensifying Competition: Aggressive pricing strategies and diverse product offerings from established players like BYD and traditional automakers, particularly in China and Europe, pose a significant threat to Tesla’s market dominance.²³
• Regulatory Changes: Proposed changes to US EV tax credits and the introduction of new fees could impact consumer demand and the affordability of electric vehicles.⁴¹
• Geopolitical Tensions: Trade policies and tariffs, particularly impacting the energy business due to its reliance on Chinese components, introduce cost pressures and supply chain uncertainties.¹⁶
• Economic Headwinds: Broader economic uncertainty could dampen consumer sentiment and slow the overall rate of EV adoption.⁹

Overall Investment Thesis and Outlook for Tesla Stock

Tesla is navigating a transformative period, shifting from a singular focus on EV manufacturing to a more diversified technological enterprise. The automotive segment, once the primary growth engine, is currently experiencing significant near-term headwinds, including weakening demand, intensified competition, and the potential impact of evolving policy landscapes. The success of the upcoming affordable models will be crucial in determining whether this trend can be reversed and volume growth re-established.

Conversely, the energy storage business stands out as a robust performer, demonstrating impressive growth rates and higher profit margins. Its increasing strategic importance, particularly its role in enabling the AI infrastructure boom, positions it as a vital contributor to Tesla’s overall financial health and future valuation.

While long-term growth drivers such as Full Self-Driving, Robotaxi, and Optimus hold immense potential for value creation, they remain highly speculative. These initiatives face substantial technological and regulatory hurdles, and their commercialization is subject to considerable execution risk. The stock’s valuation reflects a blend of these established challenges and speculative opportunities, leading to continued volatility. The unpredictable influence of Elon Musk’s public persona further contributes to this volatility, making the stock highly sensitive to non-operational events.

Key Considerations for Investors

For investors considering Tesla stock, several key considerations are paramount:

• Diversification of Business Model: It is imperative to view Tesla not solely as an automotive company but increasingly as a diversified technology entity. The energy segment is emerging as a critical value driver, offering a more stable and higher-margin revenue stream that could offset the cyclical nature and competitive pressures of the automotive industry.
• Risk Tolerance: The stock carries a significant risk profile, characterized by its high valuation multiples, intense competitive pressures in the automotive sector, ongoing regulatory uncertainties surrounding autonomous driving, and the inherent key-person risk associated with Elon Musk’s public conduct.
• Long-Term Horizon: A substantial portion of Tesla’s future valuation is tied to the successful commercialization and scaling of its nascent AI, robotics, and energy ventures. Therefore, an investment in Tesla increasingly necessitates a long-term perspective, focusing on the potential of these ambitious projects to mature and eventually overshadow the current challenges in the automotive segment.
• Continuous Monitoring of Key Metrics: Investors should closely monitor automotive delivery trends, particularly the reception and sales performance of the new affordable models. Equally important is tracking the continued growth and profitability of the energy segment, staying abreast of regulatory developments concerning Full Self-Driving and Robotaxi deployment, and assessing the impact of evolving trade policies on the company’s global operations and supply chains.

Karya yang dikutip

1. Tesla Share Price (NASDAQ: TSLA) – Stock Quote, Live Chart, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.indmoney.com/us-stocks/tesla-inc-share-price-tsla
2. Tesla Stock Price | TSLA Stock Quote, News, and History | Markets …, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://markets.businessinsider.com/stocks/tsla-stock
3. The Tesla stock price just lost 14.8% and US$230 billion – Motley Fool, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.fool.com.au/2025/06/06/the-tesla-stock-price-just-lost-14-8-and-us230-billion/
4. TSLA (Tesla, Inc.) – Technical Charts and Market Data – TrendSpider, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://trendspider.com/markets/symbols/TSLA/
5. Tesla Faces ‘Falling Comet’ Risk As Musk-Trump Dispute Fuels Volatility: SEBI RA Rajneesh Sharma – Stocktwits, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://stocktwits.com/news-articles/markets/equity/tesla-faces-falling-comet-risk-as-musk-trump-dispute-fuels-volatility-sebi-ra-rajneesh-sharma/chkzSjPRbxo
6. Trump and Musk’s relationship flames out just as intensely and publicly as it started, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/trump-musk-tax-bill-6e7845081259c34db785182c51569c0c
7. Tesla shares gain 5% as Trump-Musk feud appears to cool – The Economic Times, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/markets/stocks/news/tesla-shares-gain-5-as-trump-musk-feud-appears-to-cool/articleshow/121677982.cms
8. Tesla (TSLA) Stock Forecast: Analyst Ratings, Predictions & Price …, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://public.com/stocks/tsla/forecast-price-target
9. Goldman Sachs lowers Tesla vehicle delivery estimates – Investing.com, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/goldman-sachs-lowers-tesla-vehicle-delivery-estimates-4084714
10. Goldman Sachs reduces Tesla price target to $285 – Teslarati, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.teslarati.com/goldman-sachs-tesla-price-target/
11. TD Cowen maintains Tesla stock rating, affirms $330 target – Investing.com, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://in.investing.com/news/analyst-ratings/td-cowen-maintains-tesla-stock-rating-affirms-330-target-93CH-4866888
12. TSLA – Tesla, Inc. Stock – Stock Price, Institutional Ownership, Shareholders (NasdaqGS), diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://fintel.io/so/us/tsla
13. Should You Worry When Insiders Sell Their Shares? Here’s How to Find Out – Investopedia, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/when-insiders-sell-their-shares-11699289
14. Tesla Reports Q1 2025 Financial Results: Revenue Down 9% as Model Y Production Updates Impact Deliveries – Stock Titan, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.stocktitan.net/news/TSLA/tesla-releases-first-quarter-2025-financial-pqd83154gd3n.html
15. Tesla Releases Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Financial Results – Stock Titan, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.stocktitan.net/news/TSLA/tesla-releases-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2024-financial-7bsc7b2rbrd0.html
16. Tesla’s Energy Storage Surge: A Hidden Gem in the Electric Vehicle …, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.ainvest.com/news/tesla-energy-storage-surge-hidden-gem-electric-vehicle-giant-portfolio-2506/
17. Tesla (TSLA) Q1 2025 financial results: missed big on already terrible expectations, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://electrek.co/2025/04/22/tesla-tsla-q1-2025-financial-results/
18. tsla-20250422-gen.pdf – Tesla Investor Relations, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://ir.tesla.com/_flysystem/s3/sec/000162828025018851/tsla-20250422-gen.pdf
19. Tesla’s Energy Storage Business Is Quietly Growing at Triple-Digit Rates. Is This the Company’s Next Growth Engine? | Nasdaq, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/teslas-energy-storage-business-quietly-growing-triple-digit-rates-companys-next-growth
20. Tesla (TSLA) releases Q4 2024 results: big miss on revenue and earnings – Electrek, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://electrek.co/2025/01/29/tesla-tsla-releases-q4-2024-results-big-miss-leads-to-share-dropping/
21. Tesla | 10-K: FY2024 Annual Report – Moomoo, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.moomoo.com/news/notice/303733660/tesla-10-k-fy2024-annual-report
22. The signals of weak demand are becoming clearer, and Goldman Sachs has drastically cut its delivery expectations for Tesla. – Moomoo, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.moomoo.com/news/post/53956225/the-signals-of-weak-demand-are-becoming-clearer-and-goldman
23. Tesla (TSLA) sales continue to crash in Europe despite new Model Y – Electrek, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://electrek.co/2025/05/01/tesla-tsla-sales-continue-crash-europe-despite-new-model-y/
24. Tesla Faces Steep Decline In China As Local EV Rivals Surge, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://evxl.co/2025/06/05/tesla-faces-decline-china-rivals-surge/
25. Tesla is trying to make a statement with its Q2 delivery numbers – Teslarati, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-statement-q2-delivery-numbers/
26. Tesla Powerwall 3 Is Disrupting the Solar Inverter Market – World-Energy, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.world-energy.org/article/51492.html
27. Future Tesla cars: Launches expected between 2025 & 2028 – TopElectricSUV, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://topelectricsuv.com/featured/future-tesla-cars/
28. Tesla plans for growth in 2025 with new models, FSD and energy – Shop4Tesla, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.shop4tesla.com/en/blogs/news/tesla-wachstum-2025
29. Tesla vs BYD: Leads the Global EV Market in 2025 – Acumen Research and Consulting, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.acumenresearchandconsulting.com/blogs/tesla-vs-byd-global-ev-market-leadership-in-2025
30. Tesla vs BYD: Who Is Leading the Global EV Market in 2025? – Tech Research Online, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://techresearchonline.com/blog/tesla-vs-byd-the-global-ev-race/
31. U.S. regulators investigate Tesla’s robotaxi launch amid FSD technology concerns, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.cbtnews.com/u-s-regulators-investigate-teslas-robotaxi-launch-amid-fsd-technology-concerns/
32. Tesla now has a full page on its web site dedicated to FSD. : r/SelfDrivingCars – Reddit, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/SelfDrivingCars/comments/1l4i68p/tesla_now_has_a_full_page_on_its_web_site/
33. The robots are (almost) here, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://iol.co.za/business-report/economy/2025-06-03-the-robots-are-almost-here/
34. Tesla Optimus Robot Nears Mass Production Amid Rare Earth Magnet Roadblocks, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://9meters.com/technology/ai/tesla-optimus-robot-nears-mass-production-amid-rare-earth-magnet-roadblocks
35. Tesla Announces Ambitious Production Targets for Optimus Humanoid Robot, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://humanoidroboticstechnology.com/industry-news/tesla-announces-ambitious-production-targets-for-optimus-humanoid-robot/
36. The Intersection of Tech and Fame: How Tesla’s Optimus Bot and Social Media Influencers Are Shaping Modern Media, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.tesla-mag.com/en/the-intersection-of-tech-and-fame-how-teslas-optimus-bot-and-social-media-influencers-are-shaping-modern-media/
37. Top Electric Vehicle Trends to Watch in 2025 – AlphaSense, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.alpha-sense.com/blog/trends/electric-vehicle-trends/
38. The year of the EV: What 2025 holds for electric vehicles and emobility, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.virta.global/blog/the-year-of-the-ev-what-2025-holds-for-electric-vehicles-and-emobility
39. EV Market Monitor – March 2025 – Cox Automotive Inc., diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.coxautoinc.com/market-insights/ev-market-monitor-march-2025/
40. EV Market Monitor – April 2025 – Cox Automotive Inc., diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.coxautoinc.com/market-insights/ev-market-monitor-april-2025/
41. The fate of the EV tax credits depends on the GOP’s megabill : NPR, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.npr.org/2025/06/03/nx-s1-5414604/ev-tax-credits-republican-bill
42. Trump Tax Bill Targets Current EV Owners With New $250 Annual Fee | Kiplinger, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.kiplinger.com/taxes/house-tax-bill-new-ev-annual-fee
43. Tesla sales would remain strong even if EV tax credit eliminated …, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/ev-tax-credit-elimination-what-could-mean-tesla-us-auto-industry-ends
44. Potential Repeal of EV Tax Credits Could Impact Tesla (TSLA), diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.gurufocus.com/news/2909719/potential-repeal-of-ev-tax-credits-could-impact-tesla-tsla
45. Crisis communications for Tesla in 2025: A case study of navigating public relations in the age of transparency – Agility PR Solutions, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.agilitypr.com/pr-news/crisis-comms-media-monitoring/crisis-communications-for-tesla-in-2025-a-case-study-of-navigating-public-relations-in-the-age-of-transparency/
46. Tesla loses $150bn in market value amid Trump-Musk feud – Just Auto, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://www.just-auto.com/news/tesla-loses-150bn-in-market-value/
47. Goodbye Mr. Nice Guy? Investors dump Tesla on bet Trump may lash out at Musk through his car company, diakses Juni 6, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/musk-tesla-robotaxi-trump-tax-bill-budget-359f8ddd3739793b3c5e8ab92d191879