Washington Shipbuilder Laments Loss of Ferry Contract to Florida Company, Citing Missed Opportunity for Local Economy and Workforce Development
Introduction
The recent award of a $714.5 million contract for the construction of new hybrid-electric ferries by Washington State Governor Bob Ferguson to Eastern Shipbuilding Group, a Florida-based company, has sparked disappointment and concern among local shipbuilders. Nichols Brothers Boat Builders, a prominent shipbuilder based on Whidbey Island, Washington, asserts that their bid, if chosen, would have provided a significant boost to the state’s economy, created numerous jobs, and enhanced the state’s apprenticeship pipeline. The decision to award the contract to an out-of-state company raises questions about the state’s commitment to supporting local businesses and fostering workforce development within Washington. This article delves into the details of the contract, the potential implications of the decision, and the perspectives of key stakeholders.
The Ferry Contract: A Brief Overview
The contract in question pertains to the construction of three new hybrid-electric ferries that are intended to modernize Washington State’s ferry fleet. These ferries are expected to offer a more environmentally friendly alternative to older diesel-powered vessels, reducing emissions by as much as 90%. The ferries are slated to serve vital Puget Sound routes, including Seattle to Bremerton and Mukilteo to Clinton, facilitating transportation for commuters and tourists alike.
Governor Ferguson’s office justified the decision to award the contract to Eastern Shipbuilding Group by stating that their bid was 6% lower than the state’s own estimates, presenting the best value proposition for taxpayers. While cost-effectiveness is undoubtedly a crucial consideration in government contracts, the decision has ignited debate about whether prioritizing immediate cost savings outweighed the potential long-term benefits of investing in a local company.
Nichols Brothers Boat Builders: A Local Contender
Nichols Brothers Boat Builders, a well-established shipbuilder based in Washington, submitted a bid for the ferry contract, hoping to secure the project and contribute to the state’s economy. The company’s CEO, Gavin Higgins, expressed his disappointment with the decision, emphasizing that the contract would have generated over 1,300 local jobs, expanded the state’s apprenticeship pipeline, and injected millions of dollars into Washington’s economy.
Nichols Brothers operates a state-approved apprenticeship program, and the company had envisioned utilizing the ferry construction project as an opportunity to cultivate long-term trade skills across Puget Sound. Higgins lamented the loss of the chance to train the next generation of shipbuilders, emphasizing the critical need for skilled workers in the industry.
Concerns Regarding the Decision
The decision to award the contract to a Florida-based company has raised several concerns among local stakeholders, including:
-
Job Creation and Economic Impact: Critics argue that awarding the contract to an out-of-state company means foregoing the potential for significant job creation and economic benefits within Washington State. The 1,300 jobs that Nichols Brothers estimated their bid would have created represent a substantial opportunity for local workers and businesses.
-
Workforce Development: The loss of the contract is viewed as a setback to the state’s efforts to develop a skilled workforce in the shipbuilding industry. Nichols Brothers’ apprenticeship program is a valuable resource for training future shipbuilders, and the ferry project would have provided a hands-on learning experience for apprentices.
-
Long-Term Maintenance and Delivery: Higgins expressed concerns about the logistical challenges and potential risks associated with transporting the ferries from Florida to Washington, requiring them to traverse the Panama Canal. He emphasized the unforgiving nature of the Pacific Ocean and the potential for complications during the delivery process. In contrast, Nichols Brothers would have built the ferries locally, simplifying the maintenance and delivery process.
-
Communication and Transparency: Higgins revealed that Nichols Brothers had limited communication with the governor’s office regarding the decision, receiving only a phone call to inform them that the contract was being awarded to a competitor. This lack of communication has fueled concerns about the transparency and fairness of the decision-making process.
Analysis and Opinion
The decision to award the ferry contract to Eastern Shipbuilding Group highlights the complex interplay between economic considerations, workforce development, and government priorities. While the state’s decision to prioritize cost savings is understandable, it raises questions about the long-term implications for the local economy and workforce.
It is essential for governments to strike a balance between fiscal responsibility and investing in local businesses and communities. While cost-effectiveness is undoubtedly a crucial factor in government contracts, it should not be the sole determinant. Consideration should also be given to the potential benefits of supporting local companies, such as job creation, economic growth, and workforce development.
In this instance, the decision to award the contract to an out-of-state company may have short-sighted consequences. The loss of 1,300 jobs and the missed opportunity to train future shipbuilders could have a ripple effect on the local economy and workforce. Additionally, the logistical challenges and potential risks associated with transporting the ferries from Florida to Washington raise concerns about the long-term reliability and maintenance of the vessels.
The Importance of Supporting Local Businesses
Local businesses play a vital role in the economic well-being of communities. They provide jobs, generate tax revenue, and contribute to the unique character of a place. Supporting local businesses is not simply a matter of patriotism; it is an investment in the future of the community.
When governments prioritize local businesses in their procurement decisions, they are not only supporting the local economy but also fostering innovation, creating jobs, and building a stronger community. Local businesses are often more responsive to the needs of the community and more likely to invest in its future.
The Need for Transparency and Communication
Transparency and open communication are essential for building trust between government and the public. When government decisions are made behind closed doors, it can breed suspicion and resentment. In the case of the ferry contract, the limited communication between the governor’s office and Nichols Brothers has fueled concerns about the fairness and transparency of the decision-making process.
Governments should strive to be more transparent in their decision-making processes, providing clear and timely information to stakeholders. This includes explaining the rationale behind decisions, addressing concerns, and being open to feedback.
Conclusion
The decision to award the ferry contract to a Florida-based company has sparked debate and concern among local shipbuilders and community members in Washington State. While the state’s decision to prioritize cost savings is understandable, it raises questions about the long-term implications for the local economy, workforce development, and the environment.
The loss of the contract represents a missed opportunity to create jobs, expand the state’s apprenticeship pipeline, and invest in the future of the shipbuilding industry. It also highlights the importance of supporting local businesses, fostering transparency in government decision-making, and striking a balance between fiscal responsibility and investing in the community.
As Washington State moves forward with its ferry modernization project, it is crucial for the government to learn from this experience and to prioritize the needs of local businesses and communities in future procurement decisions. By supporting local businesses, fostering workforce development, and promoting transparency, Washington State can build a stronger and more prosperous future for all its citizens.
Moving Forward: Alternative Solutions and Future Opportunities
While the loss of the ferry contract is a significant setback for Nichols Brothers, the company remains committed to pursuing other projects and contributing to the shipbuilding industry. Higgins stated that the company will instead focus on other projects, such as high-speed aluminum ferries.
In the wake of this decision, it is essential to explore alternative solutions that could benefit both the state and local shipbuilders. One potential approach is to consider splitting future contracts, as Nichols Brothers had proposed, allowing both local and out-of-state companies to participate in the project. This would enable the state to leverage the expertise and resources of multiple companies while also supporting local businesses and fostering workforce development.
Furthermore, the state could explore other avenues for supporting local shipbuilders, such as providing tax incentives, grants, or training programs. These initiatives would help to ensure that Washington State remains a competitive hub for shipbuilding and that local companies have the resources they need to thrive.
By fostering a collaborative and supportive environment, Washington State can create a vibrant shipbuilding industry that benefits both the state and its citizens.
